A Press Trust of
There is no other country that presents a more shameful paradox of plenty—grains rotting in the open while millions live in hunger. “India is home to the world’s largest food insecure population, with more than 200 million people who are hungry,” says the India State Hunger Index(ISHI) 2009, prepared by the International Food Policy Research Institute.
The ISHI measures hunger on three leading indicators and combines them into one index. The three indicators are: prevalence of child malnutrition, rates of child mortality and the proportion of people who are calorie deficient. The ISHI found that 12 States fell in the ‘alarming’ category and one State—Madhya Pradesh—fell in the ‘extremely alarming’ category. Four States—
The report identifies that strong economic growth does not necessarily translate into lower hunger levels. Even States with high rates of economic growth in recent years, such as Gujarat, Chattisgarh and Maharashtra have high levels of hunger, while States with relatively slower economic growth, such as Punjab, achieved a lower hunger level.
“Hunger and malnutrition are often rooted in poverty. Part of the solution rests with increasing investments in agriculture and poverty reduction programmes,” says Mr.G.K.Nair, a former Union Agriculture and Food Ministry official, who had served in central government projects in Orissa, Mekhalaya and Andamans.
Several experts have pointed out that the underlying problem of Indian agriculture that threatens food insecurity is extremely low productivity. A study by the M.S.Swaminathan Reseach Foundation(MSSRF) revealed that in the case of rice, it is only a sixth of what has been achieved elsewhere. The situation is no different in the case of other crops. The system of monitoring soil fertility and maintaining it is flawed and needs urgent attention.
…..2/
Food Policy analyst Mr.Devinder Sharma in his Decan Herald(21.04.10) article writes: ”There is no reason why in the 6,00,000 villages of the country, which produce food for the country, people should be living in hunger. These villages have to be made hunger-free by adopting a community-based localized food-grain bank scheme. Such traditional system exist in several parts of the country and there is an immediate need for its revival.”
Experts and activists argue that the persistence of widespread poverty and hunger is the cumulative out-come of the public policies that produce and reproduce improvishment; of failures to invest in agriculture, especially in poorer regions of
Allegations of starvation deaths are typically met with official denials and the blaming of the victims. Public servants believe mistakenly that death from consuming no food whatsoever is the only “proof” of starvation. But starvation is a condition of not just the dead but the living, and people who have lived with prolonged food denials mostly succumb not directly to starvation, but to health condition which they would have easily survived had they been adequately nourished.
For large number of poor people who live routinely and precariously at the edge of survival, each day comes afresh with the danger of one push that will send them hurtling over the precipice. This may come from an external emergency, like a natural disaster, epidemic or riot, but even from local crises; a sickness in the family, a sudden untimely death of a bread winner or a brush with the law.
Independent studies and assessments have highlighted that government programmes are woefully inadequate to address wide-spread poverty and destitution. Presenting incontrovertible evidence, The Hindu’s Rural Affairs Editor, Mr.P.Sainath, in a series of brilliant articles captured the plight of the people and that it is the result of a profound collapse of governance.
Inagurating the 92nd Conference of the Indian Economic Association(IEA) at Bubaneswar, last year, Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh observed: “To achieve our objective of inclusive growth, we need to pay much greater attention to the education, health care, and rural development, focusing on the needs of the poor—the scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other minorities.” Dr.Singh conceded that poverty was not declining fast enough. He urged IEA to respond to these challenges.
…..3/
Report on the State of Food Insecurity in Rural India, published by the M.S.Swaminathan Research Foundation said in India, given the regionally adverse concentration of food grain production, the food security could be ensured only through improved universal PDS with adequate accessibility to the poor. Tracing the origins of the PDS to the years of scarcity in the 1950s and the 60s as a part of rationing, the report finds that there was a healthy spread of universal PDS in the 80s. But in the 90s there was a set back. The Targeted PDS was introduced osten- sibyl to reduce the cost of food subsidy, to check leakages and to prevent the diversion of grain. None of these objectives achieved effectively. Worse, it resulted in high cost due to the holding of more stocks and the exclusion of many poor house-holds.
Media reports suggest that in spite of having the world’s largest population of hungry, the good subsidy bill is proposed to be pruned, from Rs.56,000 crores for 2010-11 to Rs.28,000 crore under the proposed National Food Security Bill.
System of identifying
In the rural centres and the food deficit areas, instead of reducing the number of beneficiaries, a universal public distribution system is required experts feel. The existing PDS system has to be overhauled and this requires a strong political will. Also, there is a dire need to involve social and non-governmenal organizations in food distraction. At the same time, nothing can succeed if we do not ensure safe drinking water and sanitation to the part of the hunger and poverty mitigation programmes.
It is often argued that the government cannot foot the bill for feeding each and every Indian. This is not true. In the budget 2010, Finance Minister Mr.Prpanab Mukherjee has announced a ‘revenue foregone’ of Rs.5 lakh crore, which means the sales, excise and other tax concessions plus income tax exemption for the industry and business. The annual budget excise is for roughly Rs.11 lakh crores. This means, the government is doling out massive subsidies to the industry.
…..4/
The thrust of the Swaminathan Research Foundation Report on the State of Food Insecurity is that over the years, especially since the advent of the economic reforms, issues related to food and nutritional insecurity have been getting less and less priority at the policy level. The euphoria over food grain self-sufficiency, combined with policy shift towards structural adjustments, resulted in decrease in public investment in areas such as agricultural infrastructure, agricultural research and development of right technology. This in turn affected growth of productivity especially on small farms, with a far-reaching impact on food-grain availability in the future. In the name of fiscal constraint, food procurement, storage and distribution needs are sought to be assessed in terms of costs, leaving more room for market players in the food regime, which is having its own toll in the form high food prices.
The National Family Health Survey(2006) showed that the child under-nutrition rate in
For the Central government’s inclusive growth agenda to make a difference to the urban poor, interventions that insulate the rural poor from the multiple vulnerabilities of rural living are critical. In the rural areas, the incidence of poverty is higher among workers in the informal sector. While the government’s proposal to extend the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme to more areas, with modifications, is welcome to the extent that it will provide job opportunities and incomes to the poor, measures that prevent a relapse into poverty are also required. More important is to put in place policies than ensure access to affordable healthcare, expenses on which are a major cause for impoverishment of the vulnerable sections. A social security system for all unorganized workers, therefore, is a priority. The larger aim of poverty reduction programmes should be to ensure that the vulnerable are not impoverished because of the pressures of rural living.