Tuesday, December 25, 2012
Compensation Claims--Judicial Prescription to Clean the System
Monday, June 11, 2012
BUDGET 2012-13 AND THE INDIAN HEALTH SECTOR
KOZHIKODE RESOLUTIONS TO REVITALISE CPI(M)
Thursday, March 1, 2012
2011 YEAR OF UNPRECEDENTED NATURAL DISASTERS
According to a press release(15.12.11) issued by Swiss Re, Zurich based global reinsurer, 2011 was the year with “the highest catastrophe-related economic losses” in history, at USD 350 billion. The insurers took a hit of USD 108 billion. This is more than double the figure of USD 48 billion in 2010.(www.swissre.com)
The earthquake in Japan accounted for most of this year’s economic losses. More than 30000 people lost their lives due to catastrophes in the first eleven months of the year, said the report from the sigma team of Swiss Re. “2011 is going down as another year of very tragic and costly earthquakes. Unfortunately earthquake insurance coverage is still quite low, even in some industrialized countries with high seismic risk, like Japan,” Kurt Karl, Chief Economist of Swiss Re, was quoted as saying.
If Japan had been as well insured as other countries with high seismic risk, such as New Zeland, the overall industry tally would have been much higher. In addition to the earthquake in Japan and New Zeland, severe flooding in Thailand, Philippines and Australia triggered above USD 10 billion in insurance claims.
A press release(4.1.2012) from the Munich based German Re-insurer, Munich Re, quoted Torsten Jeworrek head of Geo Risk Research, as saying:”It is the insurance industry’s task to cover extreme losses as well, to help society cope with such events and to learn from catastrophes in order to protect mankind better from these natural perils.” There were 820 loss-relevant events in 2011. Nearly two-thirds of economic losses and about half the insured losses stemmed from geophysical events, principally from the large earthquakes.(www.munich-re.com)
Normally , it is the weather-related natural catastrophes that are the dominant loss drivers, Munich Re said. On average over the last three decades, geophysical events accounted for just fewer than 10% of insured losses. Around 70% of economic losses in 2011 occurred in Asia. In the context of severe earthquakes, Prof.Peter Hoppe, Head of Munich Re’s Geo Risks Research unit warns town planners to be very cautious about seismic risks and to give serious consideration to modern building codes and high standards.
Reinsurers also expect further claims from the US hurricane season and the winter storms in Europe. Floods in Brazil in January took more than 900 lives. 1600 tornadoes battered US states in the South and Midwest and hurricane Irene wreaked havoc on business and communities according to Lloyd’s Report 2011. (www.lloyds.com)
September 18, 6.9 earthquake in Sikkim, claimed more than 100 lives, was felt over a large area, according to a report of the National Geophysical Research Institute. On the morning of 30 December, Cyclone Thane battered India’s south-east coast causing thousands to flee from their homes. In its wake, the cyclone left an immense trail of destruction and devastated the beginning of 2012 for many. Gale force winds and torrential rain brought down telephone and electricity lines, uprooted trees, and damaged more than 200000 homes in four districts of Tamil Nadu. Forty seven people lost their lives in house collapse.(Red Cross Report,2011)
Floods in the Indus, triggered by the heavy monsoon rain , devastated vast swathes of land and rendered millions homeless, in Pakistan, in August, 2010, killing nearly 1500, and laid waste, 160000 square kilometers of land.(Frontline Sept.10, 2010)
The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, occurred on December 26, resulted in a series of devastating tsunamis along the coasts of most landmass bordering the Indian Ocean, killing over 230000 people in fourteen countries, and inundating coastal communities with waves up to 30 meters high. It was one of the deadliest natural disasters in recorded history.(wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_IndianOcean_tsunami.)
The 2010 January 12 Haiti earthquake was a catastrophic magnitude 7.00, with epicenter near the town of Legane about 25 km West of Port-aue-Prince. On February 10, the Haitian government reported the death toll at 230000. The number of injured was estimated at 300000 and an estimated 1 million were left homeless. Sigma report said Hurricane losses from Katrina, Wilma and Rita contributed to the 2005 claims.
Among all the continents, Asia is considered to be most vulnerable to disasters. During 1991 to 2000, Asia accounted for as much as 83 per cent of the population affected by disasters globally. India is highly prone to natural disasters, and the country has experienced very severe natural disasters, at regular intervals. Among the various types of natural disasters affecting different parts of the country floods, cyclones, earthquakes and droughts cause maximum damage to life and property; and heat wave, cold wave, avalanches, landslides, fire and pest attacks are also taking heavy toll on life and property at regular intervals. The Latur earthquake of 1993-94, the Orissa super cyclone of 1999, the Bhuj earthquake of 2001 and the Tsunami of December 2004 are some of the most severe natural disasters that have struck the country in the recent past.
Lloyd’s Chief Executive Officer Richard Ward was quoted as saying:”Looking back over a year when earthquakes, windstorms and floods have devastated much of our planet, business and governments alike need to ask themselves if they really are as well prepared for these risks as they assume and, if not, decide the steps they need to take to ensure their perception and their reality prove a better match in 2012.”
The Asia-Pacific Disaster Report 2010, prepared by the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific and the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, notes that natural disasters have disproportionate impacts on human development in the region. Future disaster risk reduction strategies in the region should be considered within broader development frameworks and multi sect oral budgetary process that address economic inequalities and social and environmental imbalances.
Friday, November 11, 2011
An Ominous Message from Manesar
In a joint memorandum of Central Trade Unions, submitted to the Finance Minister, in February 2011, as part of the pre-budget consultation, union leaders have highlighted the inhuman exploitation of contract labourers "who died in industrial accidents, be it the BALCO chimney collapse, fires in Agra shoe companies, in Bhushan Steel or construction workers, including those employed in the prestigious Delhi Metro project and in the construction related activities of the Commonwealth games."
Trade unions observed that contractualisation and outsourcing have become so rampant in the private and public sector undertakings and government departments. Millions of workers are at present employed as contract workers in regular jobs, to perform work of a permanent nature. These workers are paid miserably low wages and have no social security benefits, thus creating a situation "where two types of workers work side by side in an enterprise, doing the same job but getting highly un equal wages and benefits, thereby creating rifts among the workers."
The Supreme Court recently deprecated the unfortunate state of affairs prevailing in the field of labour relations in the country wherein employers often resorted to contract employment and thereby curtailed statutory rights of workers. The Bench expressing its anguish said : “Labour statutes were meant to protect the employees/workers because it was realized that the employers and the employees are not on an equal bargaining position. Hence, protection of employees was required so that they may not be exploited.” The Bench further observed :”Globalisation/liberalization in the name of growth cannot be at the human cost of exploitation of workers.”
The recent labour unrest at Maruti Suzuki have been over better wages and working conditions or against management’s refusal to recognize the unions that workers say are more representative of their interest. And their demands appear genuine. Till a decade ago, temporary workers made about 15 per cent of the industry’s total labour force. That proportion has now gone upto 40 per cent or so. At Maruti plant a person on contract would typically get around Rs.6000 in hand every month, which is a third of the take-home for someone on the permanent rolls. No medical or casual leave is allowed and each day’s absence costs a worker Rs.1500, while even a minute’s delay in reaching the assembly line after his tea or lunch break costs him half a day’s wage.
There are various other issues relating to working conditions at Manesar plant, which the workers have been agitating for an independent union of their own for the past few months and have formed the Maruti Suzuki Employees’ Union(MSEU) with workers of the plant as its office-bearers. The management and Haryana’s labour department have refused to recognize the MSEU and negotiate with them.
Though Maruti has taken a tough stand saying it doesn’t understand what the actual grievance is, the issue brings India Inc’s relationship with contract workers into sharp focus. The issue is sensitive and nation has already seen violent example of this, when a few workers killed manager of a plant because he allegedly replaced permanent workers with ones on contract.
The Industrial Disputes Act prevents any establishment with more than 100 employees from undertaking layoffs even in downturns without obtaining government permission(which is seldom granted). Firms, therefore, prefers to keep their regular workforce as low as possible and hire casual workers to adjust the labour requirements to the ebb and flows of business cycle. It has created obvious inequalities in the shop floor between permanent employees and those on contract.
Union Minister for Labour and Employment Mallikarjun Kharge while speaking at the second World Social Security Summit organized by the International Social Security Association in Cape Town, last year, stated that around 430 million workers are employed in the unorganized sector out of a total work force of around 450 million. The Arjun Dasgupta Committee on employment showed that the informal economy accounted for more than 80 per cent of total employment and calculated that by 2017, more than 95 per cent of the work force would find jobs in the unorganized sector, a trend almost endorsed by the finding of the Economic Census for 2005.
The trade union leaders point out that the employees in the unorganized sector, despite comprising a majority of the working class in the country, mostly remain in low-paid insecure jobs, have little access to institutionalized social security and are most vulnerable to the negative impact of economic slowdowns in terms of job loss and wage cuts.
The Contract Labour(Regulation and Abolition) Act was originally enacted to regulate the practice of contract labour to avoid exploitation of sweated labour. Section 10 of the Act empowers the government to prohibit contract labour in certain situations at the discretion of the government. Though the formal system has not changed, employers have devised several managerial strategies to achieve labour flexibility and control over work process, as also get around labour power. Trade union leaders have highlighted these ‘labour reforms by stealth’ which include reduction in the number of regular workers via voluntary retirement scheme, labour re-allocation, transfers, multi-tasking, freeze on employment, idleness pay, increased use of contract labour, outsourcing, subcontracting and even job freeze.
As a result of deliberate managerial strategies, the employment of non-regular workers, especially contract workers has increased considerably in the last decade or so. Primary surveys of industries in the organized manufacturing sector across India show that the share of contract workers in total workers in total workers in the organized manufacturing industry in India has been rising. Economically, frontline states like Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, which increased employment, did so by increasing the share of non-regular workers.
Recent findings also suggest that some of the key industries, such as cement, iron and steel, cotton textiles and jute, rely on contract labour for as many as four out of every five workers. In the past, contract workers were used in seasonal industries like sugar, where permanent employment cannot be provided for whole year to all workers.
New sectors such as IT and the rest of the services industry give only minimum rights to employees, key states such as Punjab, Hariyana and Uttar Pradesh take as long as three years to register new trade unions in these sectors. Many state governments have allowed IT and ITeS companies to self-certify their labour law compliance, in order to encourage more investments in their state.
According to labour historian Rana Behal, there will be more new sectors opening up in the coming days, where contract labour with peripheral rights will dominate. And there will be a noticeable decline in the organized sectors’ bargaining power too.
Evidence of exploitation of workforce is indicated by the fact that according to the Annual Survey of Industries(ASI) the money wages per worker increased by less than 6 per cent between 2004-05 and 2008-09 while the rate of inflation was higher, argues Vinitha Kumar, Advisor-Labour and Employment, Ministry of Labour and Employment, New Delhi(Business Line 22.06.2011)
Pro-corporate media frequently carry articles demanding labour reforms by amending the antiquated laws to enable hire and fire approach in the context of manufacturing growth,but unbridled labour exploitation will create explosive situation like the one at Manesar.
Saturday, October 8, 2011
PUBLIC HEALTH CARE AND 12TH FIVE YEAR PLAN
The Annual Report to the People on Health, which was published in September 2010, lists the achievements of the Indian government in the health sector. It however, calls attention to the wide variations across the country in the improvement of key human development indicators, and to the "inequities based on urban divides, gender imbalances, and caste patterns." The National Rural Health Mission(NRHM) has been described as one of the largest and most ambitious programmes to revive health care and has many achievements to its credit. The Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana(RSBY), the health care scheme meant for Below Poverty Line(BPL) now being extended to the above poverty line section, provides Rs.30000/- per family to cover treatment charges. Several States have evolved their own distinctive health insurance schemes.
In spite of the laudable efforts, thousands of rural India’s poor patients have to go without even a semblance of medical care when they desperately need it. Appropriately, the Supreme Court of India, recently, directed government hospitals in Delhi to refer poor patients to private hospitals. The Court also directed the private hospitals to provide necessary treatments, free of cost, pending the preparation of a scheme that would involve private hospital in treating the poor.
Prof. K.S. Jacob, who is on the faculty of the Christian Medical College, Vellore and Member of the Mission Steering Group of the National Rural Health Mission(NRHM), in his presentation at the Dr. Chandrakant Patil Memorial Eastern India Regional Health Assembly, Kolkatta, recently, highlighted the gross inequality in health care in India, and strongly argued for universal health care as a democratic priority. The conference also stressed the bidirectional relationship between economic development and health, which justifies much greater financial input to improve the health of populations.
Despite the increase in the country’s Gross Domestic Product(GDP), its ranking in the Human Development Index(HDI), its indices for maternal and infant mortality and its rates of under-nutrition of its people tell a completely different storey. The burgeoning incomes of the wealthy increase the indices of growth; yet these averages hide much poverty, suffering, loss of livelihoods and life.
The Integrated Child Development Scheme(ICDS) a crucial centrally-sponsored scheme launched in 1975, to address maternal as well as child health and nutrition issues, has not been very effective in tackling the high rate of malnutrition in children. India has 42%, one of the highest in the world, of malnourished children in the 0—6 age group.
Though India has achieved significant gains over the last decade, it has failed to eliminate some of the "world’s most dreaded tropical diseases." A recent report in The Lancet reveals that 205000 people in India, die annually from malaria, mainly in Orissa and the surrounding States of Chattisgarh and Jharkhand, with almost one half of those deaths in children. The State of Bihar alone account for a large percentage of the world’s cases of VL, a serious parasitic infection also known as kala-azar that affects the bone marrow, liver and spleen and is associated with high mortality.
Dr.K.D. Ramaiah of the Indian Council of Medical Research in Pondicherry, has estimated that India suffers almost $ 1 billion in annual economic losses as a result of the neglected tropical diseases. Peter Hotez the author of Forgotten People, Forgotten Diseases has observed that chronic hook-worm infection occurring in over 70 million Indians stunts the growth and intellect of children to the point where a child’s future wage earning is reduced more than 40 per cent. World Health Organisation in its first-ever comprehensive report on neglected Tropical Diseases, released in October 2010, stated that the economic burden of dengue, costs India $ 30 million annually.
Diabetes, hypertension, stroke and cardio vascular diseases, all of which are disabling and life-threatening, have increased in India, silently and relatively unnoticed. Today, they constitute a growing threat to national health and national healthcare systems. As these diseases are costly in terms of long-term care, India need to reprioritise its efforts and funding, says N. Balagopal executive chairman of the Confederation of NGOs of Rural India(CNRI) . Balagopal who also represents NGOs in the Planning Commission, said rural health-care providers and nongovernment organisations working together on a common platform would be a great help in improving the health-care system of the country.
Prof. K Srinath Reddy and his colleagues note that the Indian public health system spends less than 1 per cent of GDP, and 80 per cent of the health expenditures are incurred out of pocket. They called on the government to increase spending to six per cent of GDP by 2020 and out-line actions needed to strengthen the system.
In India, high spending on health is a major reason for people sliding into poverty. The Hindu in a recent editorial said :"If the central government is sincere about building a strong health care system during the 12th Five Year Plan(2012—17), it must accept the primacy of public-funded provision, invest heavily in both preventive and curative spheres, and introduce strong regulation."
Dr. Kuruvilla FRCS, who held faculty position in Indian and foreign universities observed : "Health service in our country is in bad shape. The withdrawal of the government from the service sector has created havoc. Private enterprises and corporate bodies have grabbed this sector. The hardest hit in this game are the poor."
India has the highest number of children under five dying every year due to the shortage of over 2.60 million health workers that the country has according to a study released by the International NGO Save the Children. According to the report, India falls below the WHO health worker threshold of 2.3 health worker per 1000 people. The shortfall of health workers at present is around 2.60 million, which includes doctors at primary health centres, nurses, midwives, anganwadi workers and male multipurpose workers. The report says over 55 per cent children under the age of two do not receive basic immunisation in the country while about 2.7 million children under the age of five receive no treatment for diarrhoea, a major killer of children.
According to Ernst and Young, as of April 2010, there are only 7 beds per 10000 population in India against the world average of 39.60. It is woefully inadequate. The WHO recommend that India increase beds by 100000 every year for the next 10 years, and double the number of doctors and nurses, which are currently 700000 and 800000 respectively. A mere 3 per cent of India’s specialist physicians live in rural areas. Hence, rural areas with a population approaching 700 million, continue to be deprived of proper healthcare facilities. According to a report of the National Rural Health Mission only 10per cent of Indians have some form of health insurance.
Kerala with best public health indicators, is now facing a serious health emergency from communicable diseases. Typhoid, jaundice dengue, leptospirosis, and viral fever, had claimed several lives in different parts of the state. A two member team from National Centre for Disease Control visited the state to study the situation. Dr .B. Ekbal, public health activist and neurosurgeon called for an urgent people’s movement for the clean-up of the state. Meanwhile, the state Health Department has started a month long tour campaign across state to raise awareness about communicable diseases.
A book titled "Morbid Symptom—Health Under Capitalism" edited by Leo Panitch and Collin Leys, convey the message that mindless privatisation of the health care delivery system in various countries, which is the result of neoliberal globalisation is counter- productive to achieving a reasonable level of health.
Aman Gupta, Principal Advisor, India Health Progress, in a newspaper article explained how the "telecom model" could be profitably used to spread health insurance culture to rural areas. Innovative products and pricing strategy would help to make health insurance "really inclusive," he argued.
"Instead of depending heavily on provate health care, we need to strengthen the public health care system at the secondary and tertiairy levels as well, through higher resource allocation and better training an deducation formore health professionls," observed health economist, Dr.Sukumar Vellakkal of the Public HealthFoundation of India. Expert Group on Universal Health Coverage, headed by Dr.K.Srinath Reddy has important task for prioriitising the initatives to betaken up duringthe 12th Five Year Plan.
Sunday, August 21, 2011
COM.GURUMURTHY'S CALL TO DEFEND PUBLIC SECTOR GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANIES
AIIEA Standing Committee Secretary(General Insurance) Com.Gurumurthy was the key speaker at the state level study camp organized by the Kerala State General Insurance Employees Union(KSGIEU) at CSI Retreat Center, Kottayam, recently. The topic was “Public Sector General Insurance and Two Decades of Free Market.”
In his one and a half hour presentation Com.Gurumurthy dealt with various aspects of general insurance industry in India, beginning with pre and post nationalization periods. Prior to nationalization there were 106 general insurance companies and with the amalgamation, GIC and four subsidiaries were formed, he said.
With the introduction of liberalization policies in 1991, he said, a series of measures to open up the insurance industry began. The R N Malhotra Committee constituted in 1993, in its report recommended reduction of the government stake in the insurance companies to 50 per cent, through disinvestment. He said the struggle spear-headed by the AIIEA could delay the government efforts to open up the sector, for a decade.
Com.Gurumurthy observed that with the passage of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act in 1999, India abandoned public sector exclusivity in the insurance industry in favour of market-driven competition. This shift, he said, has brought about major challenges to public sector general insurance industry. The government was giving in to the incessant demands of foreign capital. The justification for opening up the insurance sector was the lack of penetration of insurance and non-availability of new products.
Analysing growth of general insurance sector, he said, general insurance penetration has stagnated at 0.60 per cent. As for the improvement of penetration in life insurance from 1.60 per cent to 4 per cent, he felt that it was due to general buoyancy in the economy.
With the opening up of the insurance sector, Com.Gurumurthy pointed out that lots of unhealthy developments started afflicting the sector. The de-tariffing resulted in “massive under-cutting” in the fire portfolio, to the extent of about 80 per cent. The delay in revision of motor tariff and “selective underwriting” by private players also were challenges faced by the public sector general insurance companies, he said. In the post de-tariffed environment, he said, the intense competition would drive down insurance rates, a development which could ultimately impact solvency margins.
Com.Gurumurthy felt that on the regulatory side, IRDA should take a professional approach in the matter of outstanding issues concerning solvency regulations, further liberalizing of investment rules as well as the enforcement of price tariffs in the general insurance sector. In the liberalized environment, he cautioned against potentially higher incidences of unhealthy market practices.
Com.Gurumurthy expressed satisfaction at the performance of public sector general insurance companies and said New India Assurance Company’s loss of Rs.421 crores, during the last financial year, was due to technical reasons. Natural disasters have adversely impacted the performance of the company having direct offices in Japan, Australia and New Zeland. He deplored the deliberate attempt to show the public sector in bad light, in the context of the developments in the New India. He said the performance of the four companies in the competitive environment was extremely good. The solvency margin of the public sector companies was satisfactory. He said the public sector companies were financially sound, with investment value totaling Rs.1 Lakh crore.
Over the years, the public sector general insurance industry might be making underwriting losses but the companies have huge investment income by which they have been able to cover up those losses and have been able to show reasonably sound balance sheet over the years, Com.Gurumurthy said.
According to Com.Gurumurthy, as India continues to revamp its infrastructure, the flow-on effects will ensure ongoing growth of commercial insurance. He suggested drastic alteration in the process-oriented approach in the matter of claim settlement through motor third party adalalth. The public sector insurance companies have adopted upgraded insurance solutions system, but that has also created technical snags and the expected speedy delivery of products has not materialized, he said.
He stressed the need to have a proper assessment of the asset base of the public sector general insurance companies, since the balance sheets of these companies reflect only the” depreciated value of buildings situated in metros and major cities.” Moreover, as the shares of these companies are not listed in the stock exchanges, there is “considerable hidden value” for these companies as the same is not reflected in the books of accounts. Excess amounts paid to tax authorities, in some parts of the country, and now being challenged in the tax tribunal courts, would also help some companies, if the cases are favourably settled, he felt.
He said, the four public sector general insurance companies jointly set up Third Party Administrator to check excess mediclaim bills by private hospitals. This move, which is expected to help insurance companies to control both health insurance premium and claims, he observed.
Com.Gurumurthy expressed serious concern about the GIPSA management’s attitude towards new recruitment of staff in the public sector companies. He said several thousands of employees had left the industry and lack of recruitment was seriously affecting the service at the branch offices. He said the Standing Committee meeting proposed to the held in September 2011, at New Delhi, would discuss the matter for further action.
He said, the AIIEA has demanded the consolidation of the public sector through merger of the four companies and the benefits of such a move had been explained to the government and a campaign among the public was also under taken on the issue.
In the context of opposition to the LIC and the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill 2008, AIIEA has opposed the government move and has placed its views effectively before the Parliamentary Committee that is scrutinizing the Bill, he said.